whichLlmmodel
Back to Dashboard

GoogleGemini 3.1 ProVSZ.ai (Zhipu AI)GLM-4.5

Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|Updated: June 2026

Our Take

We recommend Gemini 3.1 Pro if you need peak intelligence for complex complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning, or the 4.5x cheaper GLM-4.5 if your workflow is limited to multi-file code and clearly defined tasks. While Gemini 3.1 Pro holds a major reasoning advantage, GLM-4.5 is optimized for high-volume budget pipelines. Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro for architectural codebase planning, or GLM-4.5 to maximize your budget for basic scripts.
WHY?
Benchmark Calculations & Evidence:
  • Coding Evaluation: Gemini 3.1 Pro was evaluated on SWE-bench Pro (scoring 54.2%), while GLM-4.5 was evaluated on SWE-bench Verified (scoring 64.2%).
  • Reasoning Accuracy: Both models were evaluated on the GPQA Diamond benchmark. Gemini 3.1 Pro scored 94.3%, while GLM-4.5 scored 79.9%.
  • Cost Efficiency: GLM-4.5 pricing ($0.6/M input, $2.2/M output) is 4.5x cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Pro ($2/M input, $12/M output).
  • Was this recommendation helpful?
    Model Specs

    Gemini 3.1 Pro

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-pro)
    54.2%

    complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+14.4%)
    94.3%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)
    $4.50Input: $2.00 | Output: $12.00
    Context WindowLarger
    1.05M tokens
    Model Specs

    GLM-4.5

    Open SourceAPI Available

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-verified)
    64.2%

    multi-file code and clearly defined tasks

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
    79.9%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)4.5x cheaper
    $1.00Input: $0.60 | Output: $2.20
    Context Window
    131.07k tokens

    Frequently Asked Questions about Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GLM-4.5

    GLM-4.5 is cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Pro. GLM-4.5 has a blended cost of $1.00/1M tokens, which is about 4.5x cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Pro at $4.50/1M tokens.

    For coding tasks, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 54.2% on swe-bench-pro (complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning), while GLM-4.5 scores 64.2% on swe-bench-verified (multi-file code and clearly defined tasks).

    Do you want to find a model for your constraints?

    Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.

    Open Model Finder