GoogleGemini 3 FlashVSZ.ai (Zhipu AI)GLM-4.7
Our Take
We recommend Gemini 3 Flash for its clear benchmark advantage, or the 1.1x cheaper GLM-4.7 only if your budget requires optimizing costs for very high-volume pipelines. While Gemini 3 Flash offers superior reasoning and coding, it carries a moderate price premium. Choose Gemini 3 Flash for quality, or GLM-4.7 for cost optimization.
▶WHY?
Benchmark Calculations & Evidence:
Coding Benchmarks: Both models were evaluated on the SWE-bench Verified benchmark. Gemini 3 Flash scored 78%, while GLM-4.7 scored 73.8%.
Reasoning Benchmarks: Both models were evaluated on the GPQA Diamond benchmark. Gemini 3 Flash scored 90.4%, while GLM-4.7 scored 85.7%.
Cost Efficiency: GLM-4.7 pricing ($0.6/M input, $2.2/M output) is 1.1x cheaper than Gemini 3 Flash ($0.5/M input, $3/M output).
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-verified)Winner (+4.2%)
78%multi-file code and clearly defined tasks
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+4.7%)
90.4%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$1.13Input: $0.50 | Output: $3.00Context WindowLarger
1.05M tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-verified)
73.8%multi-file code and clearly defined tasks
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
85.7%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)1.1x cheaper
$1.00Input: $0.60 | Output: $2.20Context Window
202.75k tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Gemini 3 Flash vs GLM-4.7
GLM-4.7 is cheaper than Gemini 3 Flash. GLM-4.7 has a blended cost of $1.00/1M tokens, which is about 1.1x cheaper than Gemini 3 Flash at $1.13/1M tokens.
Gemini 3 Flash is better for coding tasks on this benchmark. It scores 78% on swe-bench-verified (multi-file code and clearly defined tasks) compared to GLM-4.7 which scores 73.8%.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Gemini 3 Flash and GLM-4.7.
Do you want to find a model for your constraints?
Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.