whichLlmmodel
Back to Dashboard

GoogleGemini 2.5 FlashVSZ.ai (Zhipu AI)GLM-4.7

Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|Updated: June 2026

Our Take

We recommend GLM-4.7 for its clear benchmark advantage, or the 1.2x cheaper Gemini 2.5 Flash only if your budget requires optimizing costs for very high-volume pipelines. While GLM-4.7 offers superior reasoning and coding, it carries a moderate price premium. Choose GLM-4.7 for quality, or Gemini 2.5 Flash for cost optimization.
▶WHY?
Benchmark Calculations & Evidence:
  • Coding Benchmarks: Both models were evaluated on the SWE-bench Verified benchmark. GLM-4.7 scored 73.8%, while Gemini 2.5 Flash scored 60.4%.
  • Reasoning Benchmarks: Both models were evaluated on the GPQA Diamond benchmark. GLM-4.7 scored 85.7%, while Gemini 2.5 Flash scored 68.3%.
  • Cost Efficiency: Gemini 2.5 Flash pricing ($0.3/M input, $2.5/M output) is 1.2x cheaper than GLM-4.7 ($0.6/M input, $2.2/M output).
    • Was this recommendation helpful?
    Model Specs

    Gemini 2.5 Flash

    Website

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-verified)
    60.4%

    multi-file code and clearly defined tasks

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
    68.3%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)1.2x cheaper
    $0.85Input: $0.30 | Output: $2.50
    Context WindowLarger
    1.05M tokens
    Model Specs

    GLM-4.7

    Open SourceAPI Available
    Website🤗HF

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-verified)Winner (+13.4%)
    73.8%

    multi-file code and clearly defined tasks

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+17.4%)
    85.7%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)
    $1.00Input: $0.60 | Output: $2.20
    Context Window
    202.75k tokens
    Read our data collection methodology

    Frequently Asked Questions about Gemini 2.5 Flash vs GLM-4.7

    Gemini 2.5 Flash is cheaper than GLM-4.7. Gemini 2.5 Flash has a blended cost of $0.85/1M tokens, which is about 1.2x cheaper than GLM-4.7 at $1.00/1M tokens.

    GLM-4.7 is better for coding tasks on this benchmark. It scores 73.8% on swe-bench-verified (multi-file code and clearly defined tasks) compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash which scores 60.4%.

    Related Matchups

    Explore similar comparisons for Gemini 2.5 Flash and GLM-4.7.

    Browse More Comparisons
    GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash
    VS
    OpenAIGPT-5.5
    Compare Specs
    Z.ai (Zhipu AI)GLM-4.7
    VS
    OpenAIGPT-5.6 Sol
    Compare Specs
    GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash
    VS
    OpenAIGPT-5.6 Terra
    Compare Specs

    Do you want to find a model for your constraints?

    Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.

    Open Model Finder