whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

VS
Z.ai (Zhipu AI)

GLM-4.5

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, GLM-4.5 is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 0.0% higher on coding benchmarks. However, this accuracy premium comes with a cost overhead: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is 5.7x cheaper to run and delivers 1.0x faster throughput. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of GLM-4.5 fully justifies the cost.

Model Specs

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/A
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
62.5%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)5.7x cheaper
$0.17Input: $0.10 | Output: $0.40
Speed
280 tps
Context WindowLarger
1M tokens
Model Specs

GLM-4.5

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/A
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+17.4%)
79.9%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$1.00Input: $0.60 | Output: $2.20
Speed
N/A
Context Window
131.07k tokens
Read our data collection methodology

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper than GLM-4.5. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has a blended cost of $0.17/1M tokens, which is about 5.7x cheaper than GLM-4.5 at $1.00/1M tokens.

Speed data is not available for GLM-4.5, while Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite generates 280 tokens per second.

Coding benchmark scores are not currently recorded for these models.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard