whichLlmmodel
Back to Dashboard

GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteVSGoogleGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|Updated: June 2026

Our Take

We recommend Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite if you need peak intelligence for complex scripting single-file apps or clearly defined functions, or the 3.2x cheaper Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite if your workflow is limited to multi-file code and clearly defined tasks. While Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite holds a major reasoning advantage, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is optimized for high-volume budget pipelines. Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite for scripting single-file apps or clearly defined functions, or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite to maximize your budget for basic scripts.
▶WHY?
Benchmark Calculations & Evidence:
  • Coding Evaluation: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite was evaluated on SWE-bench Verified (scoring 41.3%), while Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite was evaluated on LiveCodeBench (scoring 72%).
  • Reasoning Accuracy: Both models were evaluated on the GPQA Diamond benchmark. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite scored 82.2%, while Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scored 62.5%.
  • Cost Efficiency: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite pricing ($0.1/M input, $0.4/M output) is 3.2x cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite ($0.25/M input, $1.5/M output).
    • Was this recommendation helpful?
    Model Specs

    Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

    Website

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-verified)
    41.3%

    multi-file code and clearly defined tasks

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
    62.5%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)3.2x cheaper
    $0.17Input: $0.10 | Output: $0.40
    Context Window
    1.05M tokens
    Model Specs

    Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

    Website

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (live-code-bench)
    72%

    scripting single-file apps or clearly defined functions

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+19.7%)
    82.2%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)
    $0.56Input: $0.25 | Output: $1.50
    Context Window
    1.05M tokens
    Read our data collection methodology

    Frequently Asked Questions about Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

    Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has a blended cost of $0.17/1M tokens, which is about 3.2x cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite at $0.56/1M tokens.

    For coding tasks, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores 41.3% on swe-bench-verified (multi-file code and clearly defined tasks), while Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite scores 72% on live-code-bench (scripting single-file apps or clearly defined functions).

    Related Matchups

    Explore similar comparisons for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.

    Browse More Comparisons
    GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
    VS
    OpenAIGPT-5.5
    Compare Specs
    GoogleGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
    VS
    OpenAIGPT-5.6 Sol
    Compare Specs
    GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
    VS
    OpenAIGPT-5.6 Terra
    Compare Specs

    Do you want to find a model for your constraints?

    Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.

    Open Model Finder