DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 ProVSxAIGrok 4.3
Our Take
Standardized reasoning and coding benchmarks are currently pending verification for one or both of these models. We recommend testing DeepSeek V4 Pro and Grok 4.3 directly in their respective provider playgrounds to see which fits your specific prompt styles best.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
52.1%complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
88%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$2.17Input: $1.74 | Output: $3.48Context Window
1.05M tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/Acomplex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+2.1%)
90.1%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)1.4x cheaper
$1.56Input: $1.25 | Output: $2.50Context Window
1.05M tokensFrequently Asked Questions about DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 is cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro. Grok 4.3 has a blended cost of $1.56/1M tokens, which is about 1.4x cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro at $2.17/1M tokens.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for DeepSeek V4 Pro and Grok 4.3.
Do you want to find a model for your constraints?
Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.