whichLlmmodel
Back to SearchHardware Shootout
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Pro

VS
Mistral AI

Ministral 3 3B (Instruct)

Analysis By: The WhichLLMModel Editorial Team|Updated: June 2026

Live Hardware Compatibility Simulator

Compare on your GPU
GPU Dedicated VRAM16 GB
System Host RAM32 GB
DeepSeek V4 ProOOM / Exceeds Limit
VRAM Footprint (Q4):1037.31 GB
Active GPU Load:0 GB
Ministral 3 3B (Instruct)100% GPU VRAM (Safe)
VRAM Footprint (Q4):2.64 GB
Active GPU Load:2.64 GB

Hardware & Architecture Shootout Matrix

Metric / SpecDeepSeek V4 ProMinistral 3 3B (Instruct)
Parameter Scale1600B Parameters3B Parameters
Attention ArchitectureStandard GQA / MHAStandard GQA / MHA
Max Context Window1.05M262.14k
Available GGUF Quants0 Quant Formats2 Quant Formats
Full Model PageHardware Details Hardware Details

Intelligence & Benchmark Head-to-Head

Coding Benchmark (SWE-bench / HumanEval)
DeepSeek V4 Pro52.1%
Ministral 3 3B (Instruct)N/A%
Reasoning Benchmark (GPQA / MMLU)
DeepSeek V4 Pro88%
Ministral 3 3B (Instruct)N/A%

Frequently Asked Questions about DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Ministral 3 3B (Instruct)

Ministral 3 3B (Instruct) is cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro. Ministral 3 3B (Instruct) has a blended cost of $NaN/1M tokens, which is about 1.0x cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro at $NaN/1M tokens.