whichLlmmodel
Back to Dashboard

DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 FlashVSZ.ai (Zhipu AI)GLM-4.6

Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|Updated: June 2026

Our Take

We recommend GLM-4.6 if you need peak intelligence for complex multi-file code and clearly defined tasks, or the 5.7x cheaper DeepSeek V4 Flash if your workflow is limited to complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning. While GLM-4.6 holds a major reasoning advantage, DeepSeek V4 Flash is optimized for high-volume budget pipelines. Choose GLM-4.6 for multi-file code and clearly defined tasks, or DeepSeek V4 Flash to maximize your budget for basic scripts.
WHY?
Benchmark Calculations & Evidence:
  • Coding Evaluation: DeepSeek V4 Flash was evaluated on SWE-bench Pro (scoring 49.1%), while GLM-4.6 was evaluated on SWE-bench Verified (scoring 68%).
  • Reasoning Accuracy: Both models were evaluated on the GPQA Diamond benchmark. GLM-4.6 scored 82.9%, while DeepSeek V4 Flash scored 80%.
  • Cost Efficiency: DeepSeek V4 Flash pricing ($0.14/M input, $0.28/M output) is 5.7x cheaper than GLM-4.6 ($0.6/M input, $2.2/M output).
  • Was this recommendation helpful?
    Model Specs

    DeepSeek V4 Flash

    Open SourceAPI Available

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-pro)
    49.1%

    complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
    80%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)5.7x cheaper
    $0.17Input: $0.14 | Output: $0.28
    Context WindowLarger
    1.05M tokens
    Model Specs

    GLM-4.6

    Open SourceAPI Available

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-verified)
    68%

    multi-file code and clearly defined tasks

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+2.9%)
    82.9%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)
    $1.00Input: $0.60 | Output: $2.20
    Context Window
    202.75k tokens

    Frequently Asked Questions about DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GLM-4.6

    DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper than GLM-4.6. DeepSeek V4 Flash has a blended cost of $0.17/1M tokens, which is about 5.7x cheaper than GLM-4.6 at $1.00/1M tokens.

    For coding tasks, DeepSeek V4 Flash scores 49.1% on swe-bench-pro (complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning), while GLM-4.6 scores 68% on swe-bench-verified (multi-file code and clearly defined tasks).

    Do you want to find a model for your constraints?

    Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.

    Open Model Finder