whichLlmmodel
Back to Dashboard

DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 FlashVSGoogleGemini 3.1 Pro

Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|Updated: June 2026

Our Take

We recommend Gemini 3.1 Pro if you need peak intelligence for reasoning and coding tasks, or the 25.7x cheaper DeepSeek V4 Flash to optimize your budget for high-volume pipelines. While Gemini 3.1 Pro holds a clear performance lead, it carries a heavy price premium. Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro for complex logic, or DeepSeek V4 Flash for budget efficiency.
▶WHY?
Benchmark Calculations & Evidence:
  • Coding Benchmarks: Both models were evaluated on the SWE-bench Pro benchmark. Gemini 3.1 Pro scored 54.2%, while DeepSeek V4 Flash scored 49.1%.
  • Reasoning Benchmarks: Both models were evaluated on the GPQA Diamond benchmark. Gemini 3.1 Pro scored 94.3%, while DeepSeek V4 Flash scored 80%.
  • Cost Efficiency: DeepSeek V4 Flash pricing ($0.14/M input, $0.28/M output) is 25.7x cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Pro ($2/M input, $12/M output).
    • Was this recommendation helpful?
    Model Specs

    DeepSeek V4 Flash

    Open SourceAPI Available
    Website🤗HF

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-pro)
    49.1%

    complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
    80%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)25.7x cheaper
    $0.17Input: $0.14 | Output: $0.28
    Context Window
    1.05M tokens
    Model Specs

    Gemini 3.1 Pro

    Website

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+5.1%)
    54.2%

    complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+14.3%)
    94.3%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)
    $4.50Input: $2.00 | Output: $12.00
    Context Window
    1.05M tokens
    Read our data collection methodology

    Frequently Asked Questions about DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

    DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Pro. DeepSeek V4 Flash has a blended cost of $0.17/1M tokens, which is about 25.7x cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Pro at $4.50/1M tokens.

    Gemini 3.1 Pro is better for coding tasks on this benchmark. It scores 54.2% on swe-bench-pro (complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning) compared to DeepSeek V4 Flash which scores 49.1%.

    Related Matchups

    Explore similar comparisons for DeepSeek V4 Flash and Gemini 3.1 Pro.

    Browse More Comparisons
    DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Flash
    VS
    OpenAIGPT-5.5
    Compare Specs
    GoogleGemini 3.1 Pro
    VS
    OpenAIGPT-5.6 Sol
    Compare Specs
    DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Flash
    VS
    OpenAIGPT-5.6 Terra
    Compare Specs

    Do you want to find a model for your constraints?

    Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.

    Open Model Finder