whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
Black Forest Labs

FLUX.1 Fill [pro]

VS
Google DeepMind

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

🎨 Editorial Verdict: Both FLUX.1 Fill [pro] and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) represent highly competitive options. If prompt adherence or specific styles are key, check the strengths table below: FLUX.1 Fill [pro] excels at Inpainting, Outpainting, while Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) offers strengths in In-Context Editing, Character Consistency.

Model Specs

FLUX.1 Fill [pro]

Pricing & Speed

Cost per Generation1.3x cheaper
$50.00per 1,000 images
Speed Tier
fast
Max Resolution2K

Model Strengths

InpaintingOutpaintingObject RemovalPrompt Adherence
Model Specs

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Pricing & Speed

Cost per Generation
$67.00per 1,000 images
Speed Tier
fast
Max Resolution4K

Model Strengths

In-Context EditingCharacter ConsistencyText RenderingTypographyRealismPrompt Adherence

Frequently Asked Questions

FLUX.1 Fill [pro] is cheaper, costing $0.0500 per image generation compared to Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) at $0.0670 per image.

Both models generate images in the fast speed tier.

Both models share key strengths in: prompt adherence. FLUX.1 Fill [pro] specializes in: inpainting, outpainting, object removal, prompt adherence. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) specializes in: in context-editing, character consistency, text rendering, typography, realism, prompt adherence.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard