whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
Black Forest Labs

FLUX.1 Fill [pro]

VS
Google DeepMind

Imagen 4 Ultra

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

🎨 Editorial Verdict: Both FLUX.1 Fill [pro] and Imagen 4 Ultra represent highly competitive options. If prompt adherence or specific styles are key, check the strengths table below: FLUX.1 Fill [pro] excels at Inpainting, Outpainting, while Imagen 4 Ultra offers strengths in Realism, Prompt Adherence.

Model Specs

FLUX.1 Fill [pro]

Pricing & Speed

Cost per Generation1.2x cheaper
$50.00per 1,000 images
Speed TierFaster
fast
Max Resolution2K

Model Strengths

InpaintingOutpaintingObject RemovalPrompt Adherence
Model Specs

Imagen 4 Ultra

Pricing & Speed

Cost per Generation
$60.00per 1,000 images
Speed Tier
standard
Max Resolution2K

Model Strengths

RealismPrompt AdherenceText RenderingHigh ResolutionCreativity

Frequently Asked Questions

FLUX.1 Fill [pro] is cheaper, costing $0.0500 per image generation compared to Imagen 4 Ultra at $0.0600 per image.

FLUX.1 Fill [pro] is faster, operating in the fast speed tier compared to Imagen 4 Ultra which is in the standard speed tier.

Both models share key strengths in: prompt adherence. FLUX.1 Fill [pro] specializes in: inpainting, outpainting, object removal, prompt adherence. Imagen 4 Ultra specializes in: realism, prompt adherence, text rendering, high resolution, creativity.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard