whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
Black Forest Labs

FLUX.1 Fill [pro]

VS
Google DeepMind

Imagen 4

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

🎨 Editorial Verdict: Both FLUX.1 Fill [pro] and Imagen 4 represent highly competitive options. If prompt adherence or specific styles are key, check the strengths table below: FLUX.1 Fill [pro] excels at Inpainting, Outpainting, while Imagen 4 offers strengths in Realism, Prompt Adherence.

Model Specs

FLUX.1 Fill [pro]

Pricing & Speed

Cost per Generation
$50.00per 1,000 images
Speed Tier
fast
Max Resolution2K

Model Strengths

✨ Inpainting✨ Outpainting✨ Object Removal✨ Prompt Adherence
Model Specs

Imagen 4

Pricing & Speed

Cost per Generation1.3x cheaper
$40.00per 1,000 images
Speed Tier
fast
Max Resolution2K

Model Strengths

✨ Realism✨ Prompt Adherence✨ Text Rendering
Read our data collection methodology

Frequently Asked Questions

Imagen 4 is cheaper, costing $0.0400 per image generation compared to FLUX.1 Fill [pro] at $0.0500 per image.

Both models generate images in the fast speed tier.

Both models share key strengths in: prompt adherence. FLUX.1 Fill [pro] specializes in: inpainting, outpainting, object removal, prompt adherence. Imagen 4 specializes in: realism, prompt adherence, text rendering.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard