whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
Black Forest Labs

FLUX.1 Fill [dev]

VS
Black Forest Labs

FLUX.1 Fill [pro]

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

👑 Editorial Verdict: FLUX.1 Fill [pro] stands out as the superior choice over FLUX.1 Fill [dev]. It is more cost-effective (costing $0.0500 per image vs $N/A), generates images in a faster speed tier (fast), and supports a wider range of key feature strengths (like Inpainting, Outpainting, Object Removal).

Model Specs

FLUX.1 Fill [dev]

Pricing & Speed

Cost per Generation
Self Host
Speed Tier
standard
Max Resolution2K

Model Strengths

InpaintingOutpaintingObject RemovalPrompt Adherence
Model Specs

FLUX.1 Fill [pro]

Pricing & Speed

Cost per Generation
$50.00per 1,000 images
Speed TierFaster
fast
Max Resolution2K

Model Strengths

InpaintingOutpaintingObject RemovalPrompt Adherence

Frequently Asked Questions

FLUX.1 Fill [dev] is cheaper as it is open source and can be self-hosted, whereas FLUX.1 Fill [pro] costs $0.0500 per image generation.

FLUX.1 Fill [pro] is faster, operating in the fast speed tier compared to FLUX.1 Fill [dev] which is in the standard speed tier.

Both models share key strengths in: inpainting, outpainting, object removal, prompt adherence. FLUX.1 Fill [dev] specializes in: inpainting, outpainting, object removal, prompt adherence. FLUX.1 Fill [pro] specializes in: inpainting, outpainting, object removal, prompt adherence.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard