whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
Black Forest Labs

FLUX 1.1 [pro]

VS
OpenAI

GPT Image 2

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

🎨 Editorial Verdict: Both FLUX 1.1 [pro] and GPT Image 2 represent highly competitive options. If prompt adherence or specific styles are key, check the strengths table below: FLUX 1.1 [pro] excels at Realism, Prompt Adherence, while GPT Image 2 offers strengths in Text Rendering, Typography.

Model Specs

FLUX 1.1 [pro]

Pricing & Speed

Cost per Generation1.3x cheaper
$40.00per 1,000 images
Speed TierFaster
fast
Max Resolution2K

Model Strengths

RealismPrompt Adherence
Model Specs

GPT Image 2

Pricing & Speed

Cost per Generation
$53.00per 1,000 images
Speed Tier
standard
Max Resolution4K

Model Strengths

Text RenderingTypographyIn-Context EditingRealismPrompt AdherenceCreativity

Frequently Asked Questions

FLUX 1.1 [pro] is cheaper, costing $0.0400 per image generation compared to GPT Image 2 at $0.0530 per image.

FLUX 1.1 [pro] is faster, operating in the fast speed tier compared to GPT Image 2 which is in the standard speed tier.

Both models share key strengths in: realism, prompt adherence. FLUX 1.1 [pro] specializes in: realism, prompt adherence. GPT Image 2 specializes in: text rendering, typography, in context-editing, realism, prompt adherence, creativity.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard