whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
Black Forest Labs

FLUX 1.1 [pro] Ultra

VS
Wan (Kuaishou / ByteDance)

Z-Image-Turbo

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

⚖️ Editorial Verdict: This comparison represents a classic price-to-performance trade-off. Z-Image-Turbo is the highly cost-efficient option, being 12.0x cheaper per generation. However, FLUX 1.1 [pro] Ultra operates at a faster speed tier (fast). Choose Z-Image-Turbo for high-volume batches, and FLUX 1.1 [pro] Ultra for interactive, real-time application pipelines.

Model Specs

FLUX 1.1 [pro] Ultra

Pricing & Speed

Cost per Generation
$60.00per 1,000 images
Speed TierFaster
fast
Max Resolution4K

Model Strengths

✨ Realism✨ High Resolution✨ Prompt Adherence
Model Specs

Z-Image-Turbo

Pricing & Speed

Cost per Generation12.0x cheaper
$5.00per 1,000 images
Speed Tier
real-time
Max Resolution2K

Model Strengths

✨ Real-Time Speed✨ High-Volume Gen
Read our data collection methodology

Frequently Asked Questions

Z-Image-Turbo is cheaper, costing $0.0050 per image generation compared to FLUX 1.1 [pro] Ultra at $0.0600 per image.

FLUX 1.1 [pro] Ultra is faster, operating in the fast speed tier compared to Z-Image-Turbo which is in the real-time speed tier.

FLUX 1.1 [pro] Ultra specializes in: realism, high resolution, prompt adherence. Z-Image-Turbo specializes in: real time, high volume.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard