Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 VS xAI Grok 4.5
📊Our Take
Standardized reasoning and coding benchmarks are currently pending verification for one or both of these models. We recommend testing Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Grok 4.5 directly in their respective provider playgrounds to see which fits your specific prompt styles best.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/Aexcellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
79.9%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$6.00Input: $3.00 | Output: $15.00Context WindowLarger
1.05M tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
64.7%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+13.1%)
93%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)2.0x cheaper
$3.00Input: $2.00 | Output: $6.00Context Window
500k tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Grok 4.5 comparison
Grok 4.5 is cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6. Grok 4.5 has a blended cost of $3.00/1M tokens, which is about 2.0x cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 at $6.00/1M tokens.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Grok 4.5.