AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6VSOpenAIGPT-5.4 mini
Our Take
Standardized reasoning and coding benchmarks are currently pending verification for one or both of these models. We recommend testing Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-5.4 mini directly in their respective provider playgrounds to see which fits your specific prompt styles best.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/Acomplex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
79.9%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$6.00Input: $3.00 | Output: $15.00Context WindowLarger
1.05M tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
54.4%complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+7.6%)
87.5%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)3.6x cheaper
$1.69Input: $0.75 | Output: $4.50Context Window
400k tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.4 mini
GPT-5.4 mini is cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6. GPT-5.4 mini has a blended cost of $1.69/1M tokens, which is about 3.6x cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 at $6.00/1M tokens.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-5.4 mini.
Do you want to find a model for your constraints?
Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.