Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 VS Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5
Decision Recommendation
⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, Claude Sonnet 4.6 is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 63.2% higher on coding benchmarks. However, this accuracy premium comes with a cost overhead: Claude Sonnet 5 is 1.5x cheaper to run. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, Claude Sonnet 5 offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of Claude Sonnet 4.6 fully justifies the cost.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Model Specs
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/Aexcellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
79.9%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$6.00Input: $3.00 | Output: $15.00Context Window
1M tokensModel Specs
Claude Sonnet 5
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
63.2%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
N/Agraduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)1.5x cheaper
$4.00Input: $2.00 | Output: $10.00Context WindowLarger
1.05M tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5 comparison
Claude Sonnet 5 is cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6. Claude Sonnet 5 has a blended cost of $4.00/1M tokens, which is about 1.5x cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 at $6.00/1M tokens.
Claude Sonnet 5 is better for coding tasks on this benchmark. It scores 63.2% on swe-bench-pro (excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases) compared to Claude Sonnet 4.6 which scores N/A.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Claude Sonnet 5.