Claude Opus 4.7
GLM-5.2
Decision Recommendation
⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, Claude Opus 4.7 is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 2.2% higher on coding benchmarks. However, this accuracy premium comes with a cost overhead: GLM-5.2 is 4.7x cheaper to run. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, GLM-5.2 offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of Claude Opus 4.7 fully justifies the cost.
Claude Opus 4.7
Benchmarks & Scores
Cost & Performance
GLM-5.2
Benchmarks & Scores
Cost & Performance
Frequently Asked Questions
GLM-5.2 is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.7. GLM-5.2 has a blended cost of $2.15/1M tokens, which is about 4.7x cheaper than Claude Opus 4.7 at $10.00/1M tokens.
Speed data is not available for GLM-5.2, while Claude Opus 4.7 generates 48.1 tokens per second.
Claude Opus 4.7 is better for coding tasks. It scores 64.3% on coding evaluations (swe-bench-pro) compared to GLM-5.2 which scores 62.1%.
Want to customize weights or add more models?
Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.
Customize in Interactive Dashboard