Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7 VS OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol
Decision Recommendation
⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, GPT-5.6 Sol is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 0.3% higher on coding benchmarks. However, this accuracy premium comes with a cost overhead: Claude Opus 4.7 is 1.1x cheaper to run. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, Claude Opus 4.7 offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of GPT-5.6 Sol fully justifies the cost.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Model Specs
Claude Opus 4.7
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
64.3%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
94.2%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)1.1x cheaper
$10.00Input: $5.00 | Output: $25.00Context Window
1M tokensModel Specs
GPT-5.6 Sol
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+0.3%)
64.6%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+0.4%)
94.6%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$11.25Input: $5.00 | Output: $30.00Context WindowLarger
1.05M tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.6 Sol comparison
Claude Opus 4.7 is cheaper than GPT-5.6 Sol. Claude Opus 4.7 has a blended cost of $10.00/1M tokens, which is about 1.1x cheaper than GPT-5.6 Sol at $11.25/1M tokens.
GPT-5.6 Sol is better for coding tasks on this benchmark. It scores 64.6% on swe-bench-pro (excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases) compared to Claude Opus 4.7 which scores 64.3%.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.6 Sol.