AnthropicClaude Opus 4.7VSGoogleGemini 2.5 Pro

Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|Updated: June 2026

Our Take

We recommend Claude Opus 4.7 for complex complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning, or the 2.9x cheaper Gemini 2.5 Pro if your budget requires optimizing costs for very high-volume pipelines. While Claude Opus 4.7 offers a clear reasoning advantage, it carries a moderate price premium. Choose Claude Opus 4.7 for architectural codebase planning, or Gemini 2.5 Pro to save on API costs for simple scripts.

▶WHY?

Benchmark Calculations & Evidence:

Coding Evaluation: Claude Opus 4.7 was evaluated on SWE-bench Pro (scoring 64.3%), while Gemini 2.5 Pro was evaluated on SWE-bench Verified (scoring 59.6%).

Reasoning Accuracy: Both models were evaluated on the GPQA Diamond benchmark. Claude Opus 4.7 scored 94.2%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scored 84.4%.

Cost Efficiency: Gemini 2.5 Pro pricing ($1.25/M input, $10/M output) is 2.9x cheaper than Claude Opus 4.7 ($5/M input, $25/M output).

Was this recommendation helpful?

Model Specs

Claude Opus 4.7

Website

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)

64.3%

complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning

Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+9.8%)

94.2%

graduate-level science QA

Cost & Context

Cost (per 1M tokens)

$10.00Input: $5.00 | Output: $25.00

Context Window

1.05M tokens

Model Specs

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Website

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-verified)

59.6%

multi-file code and clearly defined tasks

Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)

84.4%

graduate-level science QA

Cost & Context

Cost (per 1M tokens)2.9x cheaper

$3.44Input: $1.25 | Output: $10.00

Context Window

1.05M tokens

Read our data collection methodology

Frequently Asked Questions about Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.7. Gemini 2.5 Pro has a blended cost of $3.44/1M tokens, which is about 2.9x cheaper than Claude Opus 4.7 at $10.00/1M tokens.

For coding tasks, Claude Opus 4.7 scores 64.3% on swe-bench-pro (complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning), while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 59.6% on swe-bench-verified (multi-file code and clearly defined tasks).

Related Matchups

Explore similar comparisons for Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 2.5 Pro.

Browse More Comparisons

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.7

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.7

OpenAIGPT-5.6 Terra

Compare Specs

Do you want to find a model for your constraints?

Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.

Open Model Finder