whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.7

VS
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.8

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, Claude Opus 4.8 is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 4.9% higher on coding benchmarks. It also maintains strong cost efficiency. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, Claude Opus 4.7 offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of Claude Opus 4.8 fully justifies the cost.

Model Specs

Claude Opus 4.7

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
64.3%
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+0.6%)
94.2%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$10.00Input: $5.00 | Output: $25.00
Speed
48.1 tps
Context Window
1M tokens
Model Specs

Claude Opus 4.8

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+4.9%)
69.2%
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
93.6%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$10.00Input: $5.00 | Output: $25.00
Speed
48.1 tps
Context Window
1M tokens

Frequently Asked Questions

Both Claude Opus 4.7 and Claude Opus 4.8 cost the same, with a blended cost of $10.00 per 1 million tokens.

Both models have the same generation speed, yielding 48.1 tokens per second.

Claude Opus 4.8 is better for coding tasks. It scores 69.2% on coding evaluations (swe-bench-pro) compared to Claude Opus 4.7 which scores 64.3%.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard