whichLlmmodel
Back to Dashboard

AnthropicClaude Haiku 4.5VSMoonshot AI (Kimi)kimi-k2.6

Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|Updated: June 2026

Our Take

We recommend kimi-k2.6 for superior overall value and reasoning capabilities, as it is cheaper or equal in cost while delivering peak intelligence. While kimi-k2.6 excels at complex complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning, Claude Haiku 4.5 is suited for scripting multi-file code and clearly defined tasks. Choose kimi-k2.6 for architectural codebase planning, or Claude Haiku 4.5 if you specifically require its simpler functions profile.
WHY?
Benchmark Calculations & Evidence:
  • Coding Evaluation: Claude Haiku 4.5 was evaluated on SWE-bench Verified (scoring 73.3%), while kimi-k2.6 was evaluated on SWE-bench Pro (scoring 58.6%).
  • Reasoning Accuracy: Both models were evaluated on the GPQA Diamond benchmark. kimi-k2.6 scored 90.5%, while Claude Haiku 4.5 scored 73%.
  • Cost Efficiency: Claude Haiku 4.5 pricing ($1/M input, $5/M output) is 0.9x cheaper than kimi-k2.6 ($0.95/M input, $4/M output).
  • Was this recommendation helpful?
    Model Specs

    Claude Haiku 4.5

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-verified)
    73.3%

    multi-file code and clearly defined tasks

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
    73%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)
    $2.00Input: $1.00 | Output: $5.00
    Context Window
    200k tokens
    Model Specs

    kimi-k2.6

    Open SourceAPI Available

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-pro)
    58.6%

    complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+17.5%)
    90.5%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)1.2x cheaper
    $1.71Input: $0.95 | Output: $4.00
    Context WindowLarger
    262.14k tokens

    Frequently Asked Questions about Claude Haiku 4.5 vs kimi-k2.6

    kimi-k2.6 is cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5. kimi-k2.6 has a blended cost of $1.71/1M tokens, which is about 1.2x cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5 at $2.00/1M tokens.

    For coding tasks, Claude Haiku 4.5 scores 73.3% on swe-bench-verified (multi-file code and clearly defined tasks), while kimi-k2.6 scores 58.6% on swe-bench-pro (complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning).

    Do you want to find a model for your constraints?

    Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.

    Open Model Finder