whichLlmmodel
Back to Dashboard

AnthropicClaude Haiku 4.5VSMistral AIMistral Small 4

Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|Updated: June 2026

Our Take

We recommend Claude Haiku 4.5 for complex multi-file code and clearly defined tasks, or the 7.6x cheaper Mistral Small 4 if your workflow is limited to scripting single-file apps or clearly defined functions. While they share very similar reasoning capabilities, Claude Haiku 4.5 handles repository-scale projects whereas Mistral Small 4 excels at basic functions and scripts. Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 for multi-file code and clearly defined tasks, or Mistral Small 4 to save on API costs for simple scripts.
WHY?
Benchmark Calculations & Evidence:
  • Coding Evaluation: Claude Haiku 4.5 was evaluated on SWE-bench Verified (scoring 73.3%), while Mistral Small 4 was evaluated on LiveCodeBench (scoring 63.6%).
  • Reasoning Accuracy: Both models were evaluated on the GPQA Diamond benchmark. Claude Haiku 4.5 scored 73%, while Mistral Small 4 scored 71.2%.
  • Cost Efficiency: Mistral Small 4 pricing ($0.15/M input, $0.6/M output) is 7.6x cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5 ($1/M input, $5/M output).
  • Was this recommendation helpful?
    Model Specs

    Claude Haiku 4.5

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-verified)
    73.3%

    multi-file code and clearly defined tasks

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+1.8%)
    73%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)
    $2.00Input: $1.00 | Output: $5.00
    Context Window
    200k tokens
    Model Specs

    Mistral Small 4

    Open SourceAPI Available

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (live-code-bench)
    63.6%

    scripting single-file apps or clearly defined functions

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
    71.2%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)7.6x cheaper
    $0.26Input: $0.15 | Output: $0.60
    Context WindowLarger
    262.14k tokens

    Frequently Asked Questions about Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Mistral Small 4

    Mistral Small 4 is cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5. Mistral Small 4 has a blended cost of $0.26/1M tokens, which is about 7.6x cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5 at $2.00/1M tokens.

    For coding tasks, Claude Haiku 4.5 scores 73.3% on swe-bench-verified (multi-file code and clearly defined tasks), while Mistral Small 4 scores 63.6% on live-code-bench (scripting single-file apps or clearly defined functions).

    Do you want to find a model for your constraints?

    Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.

    Open Model Finder