whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5

VS
Mistral AI

Ministral 3 3B (Instruct)

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 39.5% higher on coding benchmarks. However, this accuracy premium comes with a cost overhead: Ministral 3 3B (Instruct) is 20.0x cheaper to run. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, Ministral 3 3B (Instruct) offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of Claude Haiku 4.5 fully justifies the cost.

Model Specs

Claude Haiku 4.5

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+)
39.5%
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+)
73%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$2.00Input: $1.00 | Output: $5.00
Context Window
200k tokens
Model Specs

Ministral 3 3B (Instruct)

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/A
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
N/A

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)20.0x cheaper
$0.10Input: $0.10 | Output: $0.10
Context WindowLarger
262.14k tokens

Frequently Asked Questions

Ministral 3 3B (Instruct) is cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5. Ministral 3 3B (Instruct) has a blended cost of $0.10/1M tokens, which is about 20.0x cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5 at $2.00/1M tokens.

Claude Haiku 4.5 is better for coding tasks. It scores 39.5% on coding evaluations (swe-bench-pro) compared to Ministral 3 3B (Instruct) which scores N/A.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard