Claude Haiku 4.5
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Decision Recommendation
⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 39.5% higher on coding benchmarks. However, this accuracy premium comes with a cost overhead: Gemini 2.5 Flash is 2.4x cheaper to run and delivers 2.2x faster throughput. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, Gemini 2.5 Flash offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of Claude Haiku 4.5 fully justifies the cost.
Claude Haiku 4.5
Benchmarks & Scores
Cost & Performance
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Benchmarks & Scores
Cost & Performance
Frequently Asked Questions
Gemini 2.5 Flash is cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5. Gemini 2.5 Flash has a blended cost of $0.85/1M tokens, which is about 2.4x cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5 at $2.00/1M tokens.
Gemini 2.5 Flash is faster than Claude Haiku 4.5. Gemini 2.5 Flash generates 221 tokens per second (tps) compared to Claude Haiku 4.5 which generates 98.5 tokens per second.
Claude Haiku 4.5 is better for coding tasks. It scores 39.5% on coding evaluations (swe-bench-pro) compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash which scores N/A.
Want to customize weights or add more models?
Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.
Customize in Interactive Dashboard