AnthropicClaude Haiku 4.5VSAnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6
Our Take
Standardized reasoning and coding benchmarks are currently pending verification for one or both of these models. We recommend testing Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 directly in their respective provider playgrounds to see which fits your specific prompt styles best.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-verified)
73.3%multi-file code and clearly defined tasks
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
73%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)3.0x cheaper
$2.00Input: $1.00 | Output: $5.00Context Window
200k tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/Acomplex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+6.9%)
79.9%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$6.00Input: $3.00 | Output: $15.00Context WindowLarger
1.05M tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6. Claude Haiku 4.5 has a blended cost of $2.00/1M tokens, which is about 3.0x cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 at $6.00/1M tokens.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Sonnet 4.6.
Do you want to find a model for your constraints?
Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.