whichLlmmodel
Back to Dashboard

AnthropicClaude Fable 5VSDeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Pro

Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|Updated: June 2026

Our Take

We recommend Claude Fable 5 if you need peak intelligence for reasoning and coding tasks, or the 9.2x cheaper DeepSeek V4 Pro to optimize your budget for high-volume pipelines. While Claude Fable 5 holds a clear performance lead, it carries a heavy price premium. Choose Claude Fable 5 for complex logic, or DeepSeek V4 Pro for budget efficiency.
▶WHY?
Benchmark Calculations & Evidence:
  • Coding Benchmarks: Both models were evaluated on the SWE-bench Pro benchmark. Claude Fable 5 scored 80.3%, while DeepSeek V4 Pro scored 52.1%.
  • Reasoning Benchmarks: Both models were evaluated on the GPQA Diamond benchmark. Claude Fable 5 scored 94.1%, while DeepSeek V4 Pro scored 88%.
  • Cost Efficiency: DeepSeek V4 Pro pricing ($1.74/M input, $3.48/M output) is 9.2x cheaper than Claude Fable 5 ($10/M input, $50/M output).
    • Was this recommendation helpful?
    Model Specs

    Claude Fable 5

    Website

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+28.2%)
    80.3%

    complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+6.1%)
    94.1%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)
    $20.00Input: $10.00 | Output: $50.00
    Context Window
    1.05M tokens
    Model Specs

    DeepSeek V4 Pro

    Open SourceAPI Available
    Website🤗HF

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-pro)
    52.1%

    complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
    88%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)9.2x cheaper
    $2.17Input: $1.74 | Output: $3.48
    Context Window
    1.05M tokens
    Read our data collection methodology

    Frequently Asked Questions about Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

    DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper than Claude Fable 5. DeepSeek V4 Pro has a blended cost of $2.17/1M tokens, which is about 9.2x cheaper than Claude Fable 5 at $20.00/1M tokens.

    Claude Fable 5 is better for coding tasks on this benchmark. It scores 80.3% on swe-bench-pro (complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning) compared to DeepSeek V4 Pro which scores 52.1%.

    Related Matchups

    Explore similar comparisons for Claude Fable 5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro.

    Browse More Comparisons
    AnthropicClaude Fable 5
    VS
    OpenAIGPT-5.5
    Compare Specs
    DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Pro
    VS
    OpenAIGPT-5.6 Sol
    Compare Specs
    AnthropicClaude Fable 5
    VS
    OpenAIGPT-5.6 Terra
    Compare Specs

    Do you want to find a model for your constraints?

    Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.

    Open Model Finder