Anthropic Claude Fable 5 VS Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5
Decision Recommendation
⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, Claude Fable 5 is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 17.1% higher on coding benchmarks. However, this accuracy premium comes with a cost overhead: Claude Sonnet 5 is 5.0x cheaper to run. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, Claude Sonnet 5 offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of Claude Fable 5 fully justifies the cost.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Model Specs
Claude Fable 5
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+17.1%)
80.3%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
94.1%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$20.00Input: $10.00 | Output: $50.00Context Window
1M tokensModel Specs
Claude Sonnet 5
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
63.2%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
N/Agraduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)5.0x cheaper
$4.00Input: $2.00 | Output: $10.00Context WindowLarger
1.05M tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5 comparison
Claude Sonnet 5 is cheaper than Claude Fable 5. Claude Sonnet 5 has a blended cost of $4.00/1M tokens, which is about 5.0x cheaper than Claude Fable 5 at $20.00/1M tokens.
Claude Fable 5 is better for coding tasks on this benchmark. It scores 80.3% on swe-bench-pro (excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases) compared to Claude Sonnet 5 which scores 63.2%.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Claude Fable 5 and Claude Sonnet 5.