Alibaba Cloud (Qwen) Qwen3.7-Max VS xAI Grok 4.5
⚖️Our Take
Both models perform almost identically, with an average score gap of just 2.3%. We recommend choosing Grok 4.5 as it is the more cost-effective option (being 1.3x cheaper) without sacrificing any real-world capability.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
60.6%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
92.4%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)
$3.75Input: $2.50 | Output: $7.50Context WindowLarger
1.05M tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+4.1%)
64.7%excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+0.6%)
93%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Performance
Cost (per 1M tokens)1.3x cheaper
$3.00Input: $2.00 | Output: $6.00Context Window
500k tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Qwen3.7-Max vs Grok 4.5 comparison
Grok 4.5 is cheaper than Qwen3.7-Max. Grok 4.5 has a blended cost of $3.00/1M tokens, which is about 1.3x cheaper than Qwen3.7-Max at $3.75/1M tokens.
Grok 4.5 is better for coding tasks on this benchmark. It scores 64.7% on swe-bench-pro (excellent at multi-file repositories, autonomous agents, and industrial codebases) compared to Qwen3.7-Max which scores 60.6%.
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Qwen3.7-Max and Grok 4.5.