whichLlmmodel
Back to Dashboard

Alibaba Cloud (Qwen)Qwen3.7-MaxVSGoogleGemini 2.5 Flash

Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|Updated: June 2026

Our Take

We recommend Qwen3.7-Max if you need peak intelligence for complex complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning, or the 4.4x cheaper Gemini 2.5 Flash if your workflow is limited to multi-file code and clearly defined tasks. While Qwen3.7-Max holds a major reasoning advantage, Gemini 2.5 Flash is optimized for high-volume budget pipelines. Choose Qwen3.7-Max for architectural codebase planning, or Gemini 2.5 Flash to maximize your budget for basic scripts.
WHY?
Benchmark Calculations & Evidence:
  • Coding Evaluation: Qwen3.7-Max was evaluated on SWE-bench Pro (scoring 60.6%), while Gemini 2.5 Flash was evaluated on SWE-bench Verified (scoring 60.4%).
  • Reasoning Accuracy: Both models were evaluated on the GPQA Diamond benchmark. Qwen3.7-Max scored 92.4%, while Gemini 2.5 Flash scored 68.3%.
  • Cost Efficiency: Gemini 2.5 Flash pricing ($0.3/M input, $2.5/M output) is 4.4x cheaper than Qwen3.7-Max ($2.5/M input, $7.5/M output).
  • Was this recommendation helpful?
    Model Specs

    Qwen3.7-Max

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-pro)
    60.6%

    complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+24.1%)
    92.4%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)
    $3.75Input: $2.50 | Output: $7.50
    Context Window
    1.05M tokens
    Model Specs

    Gemini 2.5 Flash

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-verified)
    60.4%

    multi-file code and clearly defined tasks

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
    68.3%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)4.4x cheaper
    $0.85Input: $0.30 | Output: $2.50
    Context Window
    1.05M tokens

    Frequently Asked Questions about Qwen3.7-Max vs Gemini 2.5 Flash

    Gemini 2.5 Flash is cheaper than Qwen3.7-Max. Gemini 2.5 Flash has a blended cost of $0.85/1M tokens, which is about 4.4x cheaper than Qwen3.7-Max at $3.75/1M tokens.

    For coding tasks, Qwen3.7-Max scores 60.6% on swe-bench-pro (complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning), while Gemini 2.5 Flash scores 60.4% on swe-bench-verified (multi-file code and clearly defined tasks).

    Do you want to find a model for your constraints?

    Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.

    Open Model Finder