whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
Alibaba Cloud (Qwen)

Qwen3.7-Max

VS
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4.6

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

👑 Editorial Verdict: Qwen3.7-Max strictly dominates Claude Sonnet 4.6 across all major dimensions. It is not only more cost-effective (blended cost of $3.75 vs $6.00 per 1M tokens) but also delivers superior coding accuracy (60.6% vs 0% on SWE-bench) and faster generation speeds (205 tps vs 54.3 tps). Unless you have platform lock-in, Qwen3.7-Max is the clear and optimal choice for all development workloads.

Model Specs

Qwen3.7-Max

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+)
60.6%
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+12.5%)
92.4%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)1.6x cheaper
$3.75Input: $2.50 | Output: $7.50
Speed3.8x faster
205 tps
Context Window
1M tokens
Model Specs

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/A
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
79.9%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$6.00Input: $3.00 | Output: $15.00
Speed
54.3 tps
Context Window
1M tokens
Read our data collection methodology

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.7-Max is cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6. Qwen3.7-Max has a blended cost of $3.75/1M tokens, which is about 1.6x cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 at $6.00/1M tokens.

Qwen3.7-Max is faster than Claude Sonnet 4.6. Qwen3.7-Max generates 205 tokens per second (tps) compared to Claude Sonnet 4.6 which generates 54.3 tokens per second.

Qwen3.7-Max is better for coding tasks. It scores 60.6% on coding evaluations (swe-bench-pro) compared to Claude Sonnet 4.6 which scores N/A.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard