whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
Alibaba Cloud (Qwen)

Qwen3.7-Max

VS
Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, Qwen3.7-Max is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 21.1% higher on coding benchmarks. However, this accuracy premium comes with a cost overhead: Claude Haiku 4.5 is 1.9x cheaper to run. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, Claude Haiku 4.5 offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of Qwen3.7-Max fully justifies the cost.

Model Specs

Qwen3.7-Max

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+21.1%)
60.6%
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+19.4%)
92.4%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$3.75Input: $2.50 | Output: $7.50
Speed2.1x faster
205 tps
Context WindowLarger
1M tokens
Model Specs

Claude Haiku 4.5

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
39.5%
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
73%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)1.9x cheaper
$2.00Input: $1.00 | Output: $5.00
Speed
98.5 tps
Context Window
200k tokens
Read our data collection methodology

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper than Qwen3.7-Max. Claude Haiku 4.5 has a blended cost of $2.00/1M tokens, which is about 1.9x cheaper than Qwen3.7-Max at $3.75/1M tokens.

Qwen3.7-Max is faster than Claude Haiku 4.5. Qwen3.7-Max generates 205 tokens per second (tps) compared to Claude Haiku 4.5 which generates 98.5 tokens per second.

Qwen3.7-Max is better for coding tasks. It scores 60.6% on coding evaluations (swe-bench-pro) compared to Claude Haiku 4.5 which scores 39.5%.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard