whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
Alibaba Cloud (Qwen)

Qwen3.6-Plus

VS
OpenAI

GPT-5.4 Pro

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, Qwen3.6-Plus is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 56.6% higher on coding benchmarks. However, this accuracy premium comes with a cost overhead: GPT-5.4 Pro is 8.2x cheaper to run and delivers 2.6x faster throughput. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, GPT-5.4 Pro offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of Qwen3.6-Plus fully justifies the cost.

Model Specs

Qwen3.6-Plus

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+)
56.6%
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+22.8%)
90.4%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$1.13Input: $0.50 | Output: $3.00
Speed
52 tps
Context WindowLarger
1M tokens
Model Specs

GPT-5.4 Pro

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/A
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
67.6%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)8.2x cheaper
$0.14Input: $0.05 | Output: $0.40
Speed2.6x faster
137 tps
Context Window
400k tokens
Read our data collection methodology

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-5.4 Pro is cheaper than Qwen3.6-Plus. GPT-5.4 Pro has a blended cost of $0.14/1M tokens, which is about 8.2x cheaper than Qwen3.6-Plus at $1.13/1M tokens.

GPT-5.4 Pro is faster than Qwen3.6-Plus. GPT-5.4 Pro generates 137 tokens per second (tps) compared to Qwen3.6-Plus which generates 52 tokens per second.

Qwen3.6-Plus is better for coding tasks. It scores 56.6% on coding evaluations (swe-bench-pro) compared to GPT-5.4 Pro which scores N/A.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard