whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
Alibaba Cloud (Qwen)

Qwen3.6-Plus

VS
Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, Qwen3.6-Plus is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 17.1% higher on coding benchmarks. However, Claude Haiku 4.5 compensates by delivering 1.9x faster throughput. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, Claude Haiku 4.5 offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of Qwen3.6-Plus fully justifies the cost.

Model Specs

Qwen3.6-Plus

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+17.1%)
56.6%
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+17.4%)
90.4%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)1.8x cheaper
$1.13Input: $0.50 | Output: $3.00
Speed
52 tps
Context WindowLarger
1M tokens
Model Specs

Claude Haiku 4.5

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
39.5%
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
73%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$2.00Input: $1.00 | Output: $5.00
Speed1.9x faster
98.5 tps
Context Window
200k tokens
Read our data collection methodology

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.6-Plus is cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5. Qwen3.6-Plus has a blended cost of $1.13/1M tokens, which is about 1.8x cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5 at $2.00/1M tokens.

Claude Haiku 4.5 is faster than Qwen3.6-Plus. Claude Haiku 4.5 generates 98.5 tokens per second (tps) compared to Qwen3.6-Plus which generates 52 tokens per second.

Qwen3.6-Plus is better for coding tasks. It scores 56.6% on coding evaluations (swe-bench-pro) compared to Claude Haiku 4.5 which scores 39.5%.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard