whichLlmmodel
Back to Dashboard

Alibaba Cloud (Qwen)Qwen3.6-PlusVSAlibaba Cloud (Qwen)Qwen3.7-Max

Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|Updated: June 2026

Our Take

We recommend Qwen3.7-Max if you need peak intelligence for reasoning and coding tasks, or the 3.3x cheaper Qwen3.6-Plus to optimize your budget for high-volume pipelines. While Qwen3.7-Max holds a clear performance lead, it carries a heavy price premium. Choose Qwen3.7-Max for complex logic, or Qwen3.6-Plus for budget efficiency.
WHY?
Benchmark Calculations & Evidence:
  • Coding Benchmarks: Both models were evaluated on the SWE-bench Pro benchmark. Qwen3.7-Max scored 60.6%, while Qwen3.6-Plus scored 56.6%.
  • Reasoning Benchmarks: Both models were evaluated on the GPQA Diamond benchmark. Qwen3.7-Max scored 92.4%, while Qwen3.6-Plus scored 90.4%.
  • Cost Efficiency: Qwen3.6-Plus pricing ($0.5/M input, $3/M output) is 3.3x cheaper than Qwen3.7-Max ($2.5/M input, $7.5/M output).
  • Was this recommendation helpful?
    Model Specs

    Qwen3.6-Plus

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-pro)
    56.6%

    complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
    90.4%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)3.3x cheaper
    $1.13Input: $0.50 | Output: $3.00
    Context Window
    1.05M tokens
    Model Specs

    Qwen3.7-Max

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+4.0%)
    60.6%

    complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+2.0%)
    92.4%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)
    $3.75Input: $2.50 | Output: $7.50
    Context Window
    1.05M tokens

    Frequently Asked Questions about Qwen3.6-Plus vs Qwen3.7-Max

    Qwen3.6-Plus is cheaper than Qwen3.7-Max. Qwen3.6-Plus has a blended cost of $1.13/1M tokens, which is about 3.3x cheaper than Qwen3.7-Max at $3.75/1M tokens.

    Qwen3.7-Max is better for coding tasks on this benchmark. It scores 60.6% on swe-bench-pro (complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning) compared to Qwen3.6-Plus which scores 56.6%.

    Do you want to find a model for your constraints?

    Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.

    Open Model Finder