whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
Alibaba Cloud (Qwen)

Qwen3.6-Flash

VS
Google

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

👑 Editorial Verdict: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite strictly dominates Qwen3.6-Flash across all major dimensions. It is not only more cost-effective (blended cost of $0.56 vs $0.56 per 1M tokens) but also delivers superior coding accuracy (0% vs 0% on SWE-bench) and faster generation speeds (205 tps vs 128 tps). Unless you have platform lock-in, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is the clear and optimal choice for all development workloads.

Model Specs

Qwen3.6-Flash

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/A
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
85.5%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$0.56Input: $0.25 | Output: $1.50
Speed
128 tps
Context Window
1M tokens
Model Specs

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/A
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+1.4%)
86.9%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$0.56Input: $0.25 | Output: $1.50
Speed1.6x faster
205 tps
Context Window
1M tokens
Read our data collection methodology

Frequently Asked Questions

Both Qwen3.6-Flash and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite cost the same, with a blended cost of $0.56 per 1 million tokens.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is faster than Qwen3.6-Flash. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite generates 205 tokens per second (tps) compared to Qwen3.6-Flash which generates 128 tokens per second.

Coding benchmark scores are not currently recorded for these models.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard