whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
Alibaba Cloud (Qwen)

Qwen3.6-Flash

VS
Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

👑 Editorial Verdict: Qwen3.6-Flash strictly dominates Gemini 2.5 Pro across all major dimensions. It is not only more cost-effective (blended cost of $0.56 vs $3.44 per 1M tokens) but also delivers superior coding accuracy (0% vs 0% on SWE-bench) and faster generation speeds (128 tps vs 117 tps). Unless you have platform lock-in, Qwen3.6-Flash is the clear and optimal choice for all development workloads.

Model Specs

Qwen3.6-Flash

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/A
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+1.1%)
85.5%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)6.1x cheaper
$0.56Input: $0.25 | Output: $1.50
Speed1.1x faster
128 tps
Context Window
1M tokens
Model Specs

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/A
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
84.4%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$3.44Input: $1.25 | Output: $10.00
Speed
117 tps
Context Window
1M tokens
Read our data collection methodology

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.6-Flash is cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro. Qwen3.6-Flash has a blended cost of $0.56/1M tokens, which is about 6.1x cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro at $3.44/1M tokens.

Qwen3.6-Flash is faster than Gemini 2.5 Pro. Qwen3.6-Flash generates 128 tokens per second (tps) compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro which generates 117 tokens per second.

Coding benchmark scores are not currently recorded for these models.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard