Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
GLM-5.2
Decision Recommendation
⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, GLM-5.2 is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 12.6% higher on coding benchmarks. However, this accuracy premium comes with a cost overhead: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is 3.8x cheaper to run and delivers 1.0x faster throughput. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, Qwen3.6-35B-A3B offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of GLM-5.2 fully justifies the cost.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Benchmarks & Scores
Cost & Performance
GLM-5.2
Benchmarks & Scores
Cost & Performance
Frequently Asked Questions
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is cheaper than GLM-5.2. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B has a blended cost of $0.56/1M tokens, which is about 3.8x cheaper than GLM-5.2 at $2.15/1M tokens.
Speed data is not available for GLM-5.2, while Qwen3.6-35B-A3B generates 128 tokens per second.
GLM-5.2 is better for coding tasks. It scores 62.1% on coding evaluations (swe-bench-pro) compared to Qwen3.6-35B-A3B which scores 49.5%.
Want to customize weights or add more models?
Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.
Customize in Interactive Dashboard