Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
GLM-5
Decision Recommendation
👑 Editorial Verdict: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B strictly dominates GLM-5 across all major dimensions. It is not only more cost-effective (blended cost of $0.56 vs $1.55 per 1M tokens) but also delivers superior coding accuracy (49.5% vs 0% on SWE-bench) and faster generation speeds (128 tps vs 0 tps). Unless you have platform lock-in, Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is the clear and optimal choice for all development workloads.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Benchmarks & Scores
Cost & Performance
GLM-5
Benchmarks & Scores
Cost & Performance
Frequently Asked Questions
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is cheaper than GLM-5. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B has a blended cost of $0.56/1M tokens, which is about 2.8x cheaper than GLM-5 at $1.55/1M tokens.
Speed data is not available for GLM-5, while Qwen3.6-35B-A3B generates 128 tokens per second.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is better for coding tasks. It scores 49.5% on coding evaluations (swe-bench-pro) compared to GLM-5 which scores N/A.
Want to customize weights or add more models?
Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.
Customize in Interactive Dashboard