whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
Alibaba Cloud (Qwen)

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

VS
OpenAI

GPT-5.5 Pro

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 49.5% higher on coding benchmarks. It also maintains strong cost efficiency. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, GPT-5.5 Pro offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of Qwen3.6-35B-A3B fully justifies the cost.

Model Specs

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+)
49.5%
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
86%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)120.0x cheaper
$0.56Input: $0.25 | Output: $1.50
Speed1.7x faster
128 tps
Context Window
1M tokens
Model Specs

GPT-5.5 Pro

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/A
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+10.2%)
96.2%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$67.50Input: $30.00 | Output: $180.00
Speed
74 tps
Context WindowLarger
1.05M tokens

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is cheaper than GPT-5.5 Pro. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B has a blended cost of $0.56/1M tokens, which is about 120.0x cheaper than GPT-5.5 Pro at $67.50/1M tokens.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is faster than GPT-5.5 Pro. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B generates 128 tokens per second (tps) compared to GPT-5.5 Pro which generates 74 tokens per second.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is better for coding tasks. It scores 49.5% on coding evaluations (swe-bench-pro) compared to GPT-5.5 Pro which scores N/A.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard