whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
Alibaba Cloud (Qwen)

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

VS
OpenAI

GPT-5.4 Pro

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 49.5% higher on coding benchmarks. However, this accuracy premium comes with a cost overhead: GPT-5.4 Pro is 4.1x cheaper to run and delivers 1.1x faster throughput. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, GPT-5.4 Pro offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of Qwen3.6-35B-A3B fully justifies the cost.

Model Specs

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+)
49.5%
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+18.4%)
86%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$0.56Input: $0.25 | Output: $1.50
Speed
128 tps
Context WindowLarger
1M tokens
Model Specs

GPT-5.4 Pro

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/A
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
67.6%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)4.1x cheaper
$0.14Input: $0.05 | Output: $0.40
Speed1.1x faster
137 tps
Context Window
400k tokens

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-5.4 Pro is cheaper than Qwen3.6-35B-A3B. GPT-5.4 Pro has a blended cost of $0.14/1M tokens, which is about 4.1x cheaper than Qwen3.6-35B-A3B at $0.56/1M tokens.

GPT-5.4 Pro is faster than Qwen3.6-35B-A3B. GPT-5.4 Pro generates 137 tokens per second (tps) compared to Qwen3.6-35B-A3B which generates 128 tokens per second.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is better for coding tasks. It scores 49.5% on coding evaluations (swe-bench-pro) compared to GPT-5.4 Pro which scores N/A.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard