Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
GPT-5.4 nano
Decision Recommendation
⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 2.9% higher on coding benchmarks. However, this accuracy premium comes with a cost overhead: GPT-5.4 nano is 1.2x cheaper to run and delivers 1.5x faster throughput. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, GPT-5.4 nano offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of Qwen3.6-35B-A3B fully justifies the cost.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Benchmarks & Scores
Cost & Performance
GPT-5.4 nano
Benchmarks & Scores
Cost & Performance
Frequently Asked Questions
GPT-5.4 nano is cheaper than Qwen3.6-35B-A3B. GPT-5.4 nano has a blended cost of $0.46/1M tokens, which is about 1.2x cheaper than Qwen3.6-35B-A3B at $0.56/1M tokens.
GPT-5.4 nano is faster than Qwen3.6-35B-A3B. GPT-5.4 nano generates 191 tokens per second (tps) compared to Qwen3.6-35B-A3B which generates 128 tokens per second.
GPT-5.4 nano is better for coding tasks. It scores 52.4% on coding evaluations (swe-bench-pro) compared to Qwen3.6-35B-A3B which scores 49.5%.
Want to customize weights or add more models?
Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.
Customize in Interactive Dashboard