whichLlmmodel
Back to Dashboard

Alibaba Cloud (Qwen)Qwen3.6-35B-A3BVSOpenAIGPT-5.4 mini

Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|Updated: June 2026

Our Take

We recommend Qwen3.6-35B-A3B for zero-cost private inference on your own hardware, or GPT-5.4 mini if you need instant cloud scaling without managing compute. Choose Qwen3.6-35B-A3B for offline data control and complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning, or GPT-5.4 mini for complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning.
WHY?
Benchmark Calculations & Evidence:
  • Reasoning Accuracy: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B scores 86% on reasoning, while GPT-5.4 mini scores 87.5%.
  • Coding Performance: Both models were evaluated on the SWE-bench Pro benchmark. GPT-5.4 mini scored 54.4%, while Qwen3.6-35B-A3B scored 49.5% (+4.9% gap).
  • Context Window: GPT-5.4 mini supports 400k, while Qwen3.6-35B-A3B supports 262k.
  • Hosting Model: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B runs locally for $0 API costs, while GPT-5.4 mini is a cloud API.
  • Was this recommendation helpful?
    Model Specs

    Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

    Open Source

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-pro)
    49.5%

    complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
    86%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)
    Self HostLocal execution (zero API fees)
    Context Window
    262.14k tokens
    Model Specs

    GPT-5.4 mini

    Benchmarks & Scores

    Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+4.9%)
    54.4%

    complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning

    Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+1.5%)
    87.5%

    graduate-level science QA

    Cost & Context

    Cost (per 1M tokens)
    $1.69Input: $0.75 | Output: $4.50
    Context WindowLarger
    400k tokens

    Frequently Asked Questions about Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs GPT-5.4 mini

    GPT-5.4 mini is better for coding tasks on this benchmark. It scores 54.4% on swe-bench-pro (complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning) compared to Qwen3.6-35B-A3B which scores 49.5%.

    Do you want to find a model for your constraints?

    Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.

    Open Model Finder