Alibaba Cloud (Qwen)Qwen3.6-35B-A3BVSMistral AIMixtral 8x22B v0.1
Our Take
Standardized reasoning and coding benchmarks are currently pending verification for one or both of these models. We recommend testing Qwen3.6-35B-A3B and Mixtral 8x22B v0.1 directly in their respective provider playgrounds to see which fits your specific prompt styles best.
Was this recommendation helpful?
Benchmarks & Scores
Coding (swe-bench-pro)
49.5%complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
86%graduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
Self HostLocal execution (zero API fees)Context WindowLarger
262.14k tokensBenchmarks & Scores
Coding (human-eval)
45.1%basic standalone code completion and simple functions
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
N/Agraduate-level science QA
Cost & Context
Cost (per 1M tokens)
Self HostLocal execution (zero API fees)Context Window
65.54k tokensFrequently Asked Questions about Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Mixtral 8x22B v0.1
For coding tasks, Qwen3.6-35B-A3B scores 49.5% on swe-bench-pro (complex codebases, multi-file repositories, and architectural planning), while Mixtral 8x22B v0.1 scores 45.1% on human-eval (basic standalone code completion and simple functions).
Related Matchups
Explore similar comparisons for Qwen3.6-35B-A3B and Mixtral 8x22B v0.1.
Do you want to find a model for your constraints?
Use our interactive model finder to filter LLMs by reasoning capability, coding performance, cost, and context length.