whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
Alibaba Cloud (Qwen)

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

VS
Google

Gemini 3 Flash

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 14.9% higher on coding benchmarks. However, Gemini 3 Flash compensates by delivering 1.2x faster throughput. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, Gemini 3 Flash offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of Qwen3.6-35B-A3B fully justifies the cost.

Model Specs

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+14.9%)
49.5%
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
86%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)2.0x cheaper
$0.56Input: $0.25 | Output: $1.50
Speed
128 tps
Context Window
1M tokens
Model Specs

Gemini 3 Flash

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
34.6%
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+4.4%)
90.4%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$1.13Input: $0.50 | Output: $3.00
Speed1.2x faster
159 tps
Context Window
1M tokens
Read our data collection methodology

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is cheaper than Gemini 3 Flash. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B has a blended cost of $0.56/1M tokens, which is about 2.0x cheaper than Gemini 3 Flash at $1.13/1M tokens.

Gemini 3 Flash is faster than Qwen3.6-35B-A3B. Gemini 3 Flash generates 159 tokens per second (tps) compared to Qwen3.6-35B-A3B which generates 128 tokens per second.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is better for coding tasks. It scores 49.5% on coding evaluations (swe-bench-pro) compared to Gemini 3 Flash which scores 34.6%.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard