whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
Alibaba Cloud (Qwen)

Qwen3.6-27B

VS
Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, Qwen3.6-27B is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 14.0% higher on coding benchmarks. However, Claude Haiku 4.5 compensates by delivering 1.0x faster throughput. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, Claude Haiku 4.5 offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of Qwen3.6-27B fully justifies the cost.

Model Specs

Qwen3.6-27B

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+14.0%)
53.5%
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+14.8%)
87.8%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
N/AInput: N/A | Output: N/A
Speed
N/A
Context WindowLarger
1M tokens
Model Specs

Claude Haiku 4.5

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
39.5%
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
73%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$2.00Input: $1.00 | Output: $5.00
Speed
98.5 tps
Context Window
200k tokens
Read our data collection methodology

Frequently Asked Questions

Pricing data is currently unavailable for one or both of these models, so a direct cost comparison cannot be determined.

Speed data is not available for Qwen3.6-27B, while Claude Haiku 4.5 generates 98.5 tokens per second.

Qwen3.6-27B is better for coding tasks. It scores 53.5% on coding evaluations (swe-bench-pro) compared to Claude Haiku 4.5 which scores 39.5%.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard