whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
Alibaba Cloud (Qwen)

Qwen2.5-32B

VS
OpenAI

GPT-5.5 Pro

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, GPT-5.5 Pro is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 2.0% higher on coding benchmarks. However, this accuracy premium comes with a cost overhead: Qwen2.5-32B is 1.0x cheaper to run and delivers 1.7x faster throughput. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, Qwen2.5-32B offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of GPT-5.5 Pro fully justifies the cost.

Model Specs

Qwen2.5-32B

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+)
2%
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
49.5%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
N/AInput: N/A | Output: N/A
Speed1.7x faster
128 tps
Context Window
131.07k tokens
Model Specs

GPT-5.5 Pro

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/A
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+46.7%)
96.2%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
$67.50Input: $30.00 | Output: $180.00
Speed
74 tps
Context WindowLarger
1.05M tokens

Frequently Asked Questions

Pricing data is currently unavailable for one or both of these models, so a direct cost comparison cannot be determined.

Qwen2.5-32B is faster than GPT-5.5 Pro. Qwen2.5-32B generates 128 tokens per second (tps) compared to GPT-5.5 Pro which generates 74 tokens per second.

Qwen2.5-32B is better for coding tasks. It scores 2% on coding evaluations (swe-bench-pro) compared to GPT-5.5 Pro which scores N/A.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard