whichllmmodel
Back to Dashboard
Alibaba Cloud (Qwen)

Qwen2.5-32B

VS
Mistral AI

odestral 22B v0.1

✍️ Analysis by:the whichllmmodel Editorial Team|📅 Updated: June 2026

Decision Recommendation

⚖️ Editorial Verdict: In our analysis, Qwen2.5-32B is the premium intelligence choice, scoring 2.0% higher on coding benchmarks. However, odestral 22B v0.1 compensates by delivering 1.6x faster throughput. If you are building high-volume, simple chatbots or processing massive amounts of text where budget is critical, odestral 22B v0.1 offers excellent cost savings. For agentic reasoning, code refactoring, or complex logical tasks, the accuracy premium of Qwen2.5-32B fully justifies the cost.

Model Specs

Qwen2.5-32B

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)Winner (+)
2%
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)Winner (+)
49.5%

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
N/AInput: N/A | Output: N/A
Speed
128 tps
Context WindowLarger
131.07k tokens
Model Specs

odestral 22B v0.1

Benchmarks & Scores

Coding (swe-bench-pro)
N/A
Reasoning (gpqa-diamond)
N/A

Cost & Performance

Cost (per 1M tokens)
N/AInput: N/A | Output: N/A
Speed1.6x faster
200 tps
Context Window
32.77k tokens
Read our data collection methodology

Frequently Asked Questions

Pricing data is currently unavailable for one or both of these models, so a direct cost comparison cannot be determined.

odestral 22B v0.1 is faster than Qwen2.5-32B. odestral 22B v0.1 generates 200 tokens per second (tps) compared to Qwen2.5-32B which generates 128 tokens per second.

Qwen2.5-32B is better for coding tasks. It scores 2% on coding evaluations (swe-bench-pro) compared to odestral 22B v0.1 which scores N/A.

Want to customize weights or add more models?

Open our interactive dashboard where you can adjust your priority levels for speed, budget, or accuracy slider-bars and watch model rankings calculate dynamically.

Customize in Interactive Dashboard